请问这句话的语法结构是否正确?His obvious changes in character were brought out by a number of unfortunate incidents in life.1.为什么一开头用his而不是he?2.本句的谓语动词是changes还是were brought out?为什么?

请问这句话的语法结构是否正确?His obvious changes in character were brought out by a number of unfortunate incidents in life.1.为什么一开头用his而不是he?2.本句的谓语动词是changes还是were brought out?为什么?
请问这句话的语法结构是否正确?
His obvious changes in character were brought out by a number of unfortunate incidents in life.
1.为什么一开头用his而不是he?
2.本句的谓语动词是changes还是were brought out?为什么?

请问这句话的语法结构是否正确?His obvious changes in character were brought out by a number of unfortunate incidents in life.1.为什么一开头用his而不是he?2.本句的谓语动词是changes还是were brought out?为什么?
His obvious changes in character were brought out by a number of unfortunate incidents in life
生活中很多的不幸给他的性格带来了很明显的改变
这是个被动语句
主语 His obvious changes in character
谓语动词 were brought out
宾语 a number of unfortunate incidents in life
1.为什么一开头用his而不是he?
His obvious changes 这里是他的改变,而不是他改变,所以不能用HE
这个从HE 于HIS的单词意思就可以很好解决
2.本句的谓语动词是changes还是were brought out?为什么?
因为这是个被动语态：be+过去分词,所以这里were brought out是谓语动词,这是固定语法搭配,changes在这里不是动词而是名词改变的意思

因为是他的所以用his,并不是在句首就要用he ,he 是主格，这里用所有格。
were是位于，his obvious changes当作整体看待

这一句话中的changes是名词故用his 谓语是were

1、changes是名词，因此要用形容词性物主代词
2、是were brought out，
整句话的意思是“很多生活中的不幸事件使她的性格发生明显变化”

主语是his obvious changes,谓语是were brought out
his是he的所有格，意为“他的”
当his是he的名词所有格时可以做主语
这里的change是名词“改变”的意思

句子的意思是“生活中众多不幸给他的性格带来了很明显的改变”
那么 你在看到一个句子要分析结构并不是要你去分析什么语法 只是简单的了解

1.之所以是his，因为changes在这是名词，不是动词，翻译成他的明显的变化，就好比只能说his books不能说he book一样，必须要用名词性物主代词。
2.本句的谓语动词是were brought out