一个句子,Arthur had a carpenter build the Round Table to show that no knight,not even Arthur himself was “head of the table”.前面有个had后面有个build,岂不是两个动词?怎么可以并用?

一个句子,Arthur had a carpenter build the Round Table to show that no knight,not even Arthur himself was “head of the table”.前面有个had后面有个build,岂不是两个动词?怎么可以并用?
一个句子,
Arthur had a carpenter build the Round Table to show that no knight,not even Arthur himself was “head of the table”.
前面有个had后面有个build,岂不是两个动词?怎么可以并用?

一个句子,Arthur had a carpenter build the Round Table to show that no knight,not even Arthur himself was “head of the table”.前面有个had后面有个build,岂不是两个动词?怎么可以并用?
have sth.done主要有两种用法和意义：1.表示“使（让,要,叫）某事被做”,强调主语意志,过去分词done所表示的动作由他人完成.2.以主语为重点,意味着对主语不利的事,常有“遭受”的含意.此时,done所表示的动作执行者不明.在使用中,done由其他实义动作执行者代替.例如：I have my photograph taken.我（让人）照了个相.I had my watch repaired yesterday.我昨天（让人）把我的表修了.He had his arm broken.他的胳膊折断了.He had his house burnt down in the fire.他的房子在大火中烧光了.
have sb.do 和have sb.doing都用来表示“让（使）某人做某事”的意思,动词do和doing的动作均由sb.执行.这两个词组不同的是前者的do表示一般意义,而后者的doing则强调一直做某个动作.在使用中,do和doing可由其他实义动词代换.例如：I had him take my photograph.我让他给我照相.He had Joe clean his shoes.他要乔给他擦鞋.Try to have her speaking!设法让她继续说话.

这句子是错的吧 不可能有两个谓语啊

Arthur had a carpenter (who) build the...... 省略

Arthur had a carpenter build the Round Table to show that no knight, not even Arthur himself was “head of the table”.
翻译：亚瑟王让木匠造了张圆桌，以表示没有一个骑士，包括亚瑟王自己，是“桌子的主位”。
have somebody do something 是“让某...

全部展开

Arthur had a carpenter build the Round Table to show that no knight, not even Arthur himself was “head of the table”.
翻译：亚瑟王让木匠造了张圆桌，以表示没有一个骑士，包括亚瑟王自己，是“桌子的主位”。
have somebody do something 是“让某人做某事”的词组；had a carpenter build the Round Table即“让木匠造了张圆桌”
后面的build 是不带to 的不定式，属于非谓语动词，即可以理解成had a carpenter (to) build the Round Table；同一个简单句不能有两个谓语动词，这是不矛盾的。
希望帮到你。

收起

这是让某人做某事的表达方法。是木匠去建造 round table，所以从逻辑上看是主谓关系，不是主语Arthur去做，可以用此结构。

体现了have sth done 这种用法。语法没问题
亚瑟王让木匠造了张圆桌，以表示没有一个骑士，包括亚瑟王自己，是“桌子的主位”。

这个不是错误的
我举一个例子吧
i have my hair cut
have cut是动词 可是是正确的
有这种句型
have +ved