英语翻译现状改革开放以来,我国经济取得了突破性的进展.GDP问题接连超过英国、日本,经济实力跃居世界第二,综合国力不断增强.但在这一系列成就的进程中,分配失衡的问题也日益凸显.我国

英语翻译现状改革开放以来,我国经济取得了突破性的进展.GDP问题接连超过英国、日本,经济实力跃居世界第二,综合国力不断增强.但在这一系列成就的进程中,分配失衡的问题也日益凸显.我国
英语翻译
现状
改革开放以来,我国经济取得了突破性的进展.GDP问题接连超过英国、日本,经济实力跃居世界第二,综合国力不断增强.但在这一系列成就的进程中,分配失衡的问题也日益凸显.我国在居民收入分配已经由一个平均主义盛行的国家变成了一个程度较高的不平等国家.
一、 居民收入
居民收入在国民收入分配中的比重下降.改革开放以来,政府、企业、居民三者分配关系的演变大体可分为向居民倾斜(1978～1995)和向政府、企业倾斜（1996年至今）两个阶段.2000~2007年,居民可支配收入占国民可支配 总收入的比重从65.5%下降到57.5%,下降8个百分点,政府和企业占比则分别提高5.2个和2.8个百分点,劳动者报酬在国民收入初次分析 比重从51.4%下降到39.7%.
居民之间的收入差距扩大.无论是城乡之间、城乡内部,还是行业之间、地区之间,居民收入差距均呈扩大趋势,低收入群体增收难度较大.
就业人员的收入差距也在扩大口000～2008年,在城镇职工中,国有单位、集体单位、其他单位职工实际工资分别增长1.75倍、1.48倍和1.18倍；行业门类间的工资差距由2000年的2.60倍,扩大 到2007年的4.46倍；2008年证券和纺织两大行业的职工平均工资之比达到创记录的10.6倍.低收入群体收入增幅放缓,2000～2008年,城乡低收入家庭人均收入分别增长90%和64%,明显低于城乡居民人均收入151%t和111%的增幅.
居民收入在国民收入分配中的比重逐年下降：
劳动报酬在居民实效分配中的比重逐年下降：
二、 城乡差距
当前城乡二元结构是我们居民收入差距扩大的主要表现之处.国家发改委社会所一项研究表明,2007年城乡居民收税总收入差距的贡献率达64.5%.东部沿海地区拥有区位优势和资源、人才、产业领取疚,经济发展快,收入水平提高得快,中西部地区发展滞后,收入增长相对较慢.2007年我国城镇居民财产性收入的基尼系数为0.54,农村居民为0.51,这个系数远远超过城乡居民总收入的基尼系数,并呈逐年扩大的态势.
城乡居民收入差距倍数比较：
三、 两极分化
收入两极分化日趋明显,特别是腐败和灰色收入在一定程序上加剧收入分配差距,社会影响.中国经济改革研究会的一项研究表明,加上隐性收入后,2005年城镇最高与最低收入10%家庭间的人均收入差距从统计显示的9倍扩大到31倍.主要是企业家、个体经营者、专业技术人员、医生、老师、文艺工作者以及部分公职人员存在大量隐性收入.而且近10年来收入差距的扩大 还伴随着私人财富（以及财产性收入）差距的急剧增长.经济学家们根据家庭收入和财富的独立取样调查,私人财富分配与灰色收入紧密相关.
四、 基尼系数
根据官方的统计数据,大部分经济学家对中国基尼系数的估计在0.45和0.5之间,远高于0.4的世界警戒标准.实际上我国居民收入的基尼系数2000年超过0.4的国际警戒线之后,呈不断扩大的趋势,2008年达到0.47.其中,城镇居民基尼系数支配收入与农民人均纯收入之经从2000年的2.79：1扩大到2008年的3.31：1,绝对差距已经超过1.2万元.
城镇和农村分别的基尼系数趋势图：
第一大点上有一个地方写错了,应该是就业人员的收入差距也在扩大,2000～2008年,

英语翻译现状改革开放以来,我国经济取得了突破性的进展.GDP问题接连超过英国、日本,经济实力跃居世界第二,综合国力不断增强.但在这一系列成就的进程中,分配失衡的问题也日益凸显.我国
Present situation
Since the reform and opening up, China's economy has made breakthrough progress. The GDP problem for more than the UK, Japan, economic strength ranks second in the world, the comprehensive national strength has been enhanced. But in this a series of achievements in the process, the imbalance in the distribution of the issues are also increasingly prominent. Our country has been prevalent in income distribution by an egalitarian country into a higher degree of unequal countries.
One, the income of residents
The proportion of income in the national income decline. Since the reform and opening up, the evolution of the residents of three distribution relation between government, enterprise, can be roughly divided into residents tilt (1978 ~ 1995) and inclined to the government, enterprises (1996 present) two stages. 2000~2007 years, the disposable income of residents accounted for the national total disposable income has fallen from 65.5% to 57.5%, down 8 percentage points, the government and enterprises accounted for an increase of 5.2 percentage points and 2.8 percentage points respectively, labor income in national income has fallen from 51.4% to 39.7% analysis.
Expansion of the income gap between residents. Both the internal between urban and rural areas, between urban and rural areas, between the industry, or, the income gap of residents increased, low income groups income difficult.
Employment income gap also is expanding port from 000 to 2008, the urban workers, state-owned units, collective units, other units of the actual wage growth respectively 1.75 times, 1.48 times and 1.18 times; the wage gap among industries by 2.60 times in 2000, expanded to 4.46 times in 2007; in 2008 the securities and textile two industry average wage ratio reached a record 10.6 times. Low income groups income growth slowdown, 2000 ~ 2008, urban and rural low income families with per capita income growth of 90% and 64% respectively, significantly lower than the urban and rural residents per capita income 151%t and an increase of 111%.
The proportion of income in the national income has decreased year by year:
The labor share in the actual distribution of residents declined year by year:
Two, the gap between urban and rural areas
The two structure in urban and rural areas is mainly to expand our income gap. The national development and Reform Commission society one study showed that, in 2007 the total income gap between urban and rural residents tax contribution rate of 64.5%. The eastern coastal area has the advantages of location and resources, talents, industry to receive the guilt, the fast economic development, income level improve quickly, the western region development lag, income growth is relatively slow. The Gini coefficient in 2007 China's urban residents property income of rural residents was 0.54, the coefficient is 0.51, far more than the Gini coefficient of total income of urban and rural residents, and shows increasing trend.
Multiple comparison of income gap between urban and rural residents:
Three, the polarization
Income polarization is becoming more and more obvious, especially the corruption and grey income in certain procedures intensifies the gap of income distribution, social influence. A study on Chinese economic reform will show, plus hidden income, per capita income gap between the highest and lowest income in cities and towns in 2005 10% families from 9 times to 31 times the statistics. Mainly, the self-employed entrepreneurs, professional and technical personnel, doctors, teachers, writers and artists and some officials there are a lot of hidden income. And in the last 10 years of income gap enlargement accompanied by private wealth (and property income rapid growth gap). Economists according to independent sampling survey of household income and wealth, the private wealth distribution is closely related with the gray income.
Four, the Gene coefficient
According to official statistics, most economists on China's Gini coefficient is estimated at between 0.45 and 0.5, far higher than 0.4 of the world's alert level. Actually in 2000 the Gene coefficient of income of our country dweller exceeds the international warning line of 0.4, showed increasing trend, which in 2008 reached 0.47., the Gene coefficient of urban residents disposable income per capita net income of farmers by expanding and from 2.79:1 in 2000 to 3.31:1 in 2008, most of the gap is more than 12000 yuan.
Urban and rural Gini coefficient trends respectively:
There is a place for the wrong the first point, should be employment income gap also is expanding, 2000 ~ 2008,